Where should you park relative to the grocery store, if you’re conscientious and intend to return your shopping cart to the “shopping cart docking bay”? Surprisingly, under a particular set of (ordinary) assumptions, it doesn’t matter.
Assumption 1. The shopping cart docking bay is closer than the store itself, no matter where you park.
Assumption 2. You will return your cart after unloading groceries into your vehicle.
Assumption 3. You’d like to minimize walking distance in total, including both before shopping and after.
Assumption 4. You park between the store and the docking bay.
Consider the following diagram:
Assumption 1 means that we know L > x, no matter where the car is. (Without this assumption, you might be tempted to return the cart to the store itself, which messes things up.) So, you park the car anywhere you like. Before you shop, you walk to the store (distance L). Afterwards, you walk back the car (L) to unload then walk to the docking bay (x) to leave your cart, then walk back to the car (x). Then:
Total distance walked = L+L+x+x = 2L+2x = 2(L+x)
Here’s the kicker: the distance (L+x) is a constant (i.e. it’s the distance from the store to a docking bay). So:
No matter where you park, you will always travel twice the distance between the store and the docking bay.
If you park closer to the store, you have less distance to walk before you shop, but more distance afterwards. If you park right next to the shopping cart docking bay, the reverse is true; you walk more at the beginning but less distance after returning the cart. Of course, had you parked beyond the docking bay, this analysis fails.
My thanks to my friend Dr. William Hodge, who came up with this theorem in his head one day while walking into a Harris Teeter.
Many Worlds Theory 